Plaidoyer AUSSIE pour + de technicité à l'avant

Treatment at point of injury—A proposal for an enhanced combat first aider and health technician skillset

Pilgrim C. et Al. JMVH 2022, oncline first 

 

Management of trauma in the future operating environment might be significantly different from the recent experience in the Middle East Region if it were to occur in the context of hostilities between coalition, including Australian forces and a near-peer or peer-level threat. Specifically, reliance on rotary-wing aeromedical evacuation may be compromised if air superiority is degraded or denied.

Two alternative approaches may be considered in the context of constrained evacuation capability. First, enhanced treatment of the injured soldier on the ground at or near the point of injury by first responders may broaden the window during which a patient may survive on the battlefield awaiting evacuation. Alternatively, moving the surgical resources to the casualty may also improve the chances of survival for an injured soldier. However, this comes at the cost of risking higher-level assets. The first of these approaches is considered here with an exploration of what life-saving interventions (LSI) can be delivered by first responder soldiers. Numerically dropping as a result of tactical combat casualty care principles but persisting as causes of preventable battlefield death, exsanguinating extremity haemorrhage, tension pneumothorax and airway obstruction are areas where future gains may be possible with an expanded skillset deliverable by combat first aiders and health technicians.

Earlier administration of blood products by health technicians to casualties with exsanguinating haemorrhage would align military trauma management principles with the civilian world, where blood products can now be administered en route by trained paramedics. Similarly, there is a shift towards managing tension pneumothorax with finger thoracostomy in preference to needle decompression in the hospital and pre-hospital environment in the civilian sector.

Of much greater complexity, management of non-compressible truncal haemorrhage remains problematic on the battlefield. A highly specialised intervention with significant haemodynamic consequences that nevertheless has been shown to be achievable in both military and civilian contexts is REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta). This technique is encumbered with a significant training burden but warrants discussion and is most relevant when evacuation times are expected to fall between 1 and 6 hours. Expanding the skillset deliverable by combat first aiders and health technicians may offset delays in evacuation and maintain battlefield casualty survival in the future operating environment and may be obtained leveraging existing Defence training programs.